Monday, September 28, 2009

Roman Polanski & Liberal Hypocrisy


LOTS OF LIBERALS support the U.S. going after Roman Polanski, but I must ask, what's the big deal?
  • It's only about sex, right?
  • It's nobody's business, right?
  • It's between him & the girl (who forgave him), so drop the charges, right?
Personally, I think Roman's problem was having sex with a girl. If he was smart, he would have had sex with a young boy instead. That way, every liberal and gay rights supporter in America would be celebrating his actions and defending him until the bitter end.

And before any of you libs gasp and act all offended, I suggest you google "gerry studds" to remind yourselves that you did just that...

Please subscribe to receive GOP Thinker's commentary, where we laugh at the lunacy and hypocrisy of the left.




Share/Save/Bookmark

Click here for an e-mail subscription

2 comments:

  1. VigilanteSeptember 28, 2009 at 7:15 AM

    Polanski's crime of statutory rape case may have resolved itself as a victimless crime by now with his undisclosed settlement with Samantha Geimer. But his crime of flight to evade justice has not been resolved. And it cannot be resolved until such time as he is remanded into custody of the same court from which he has been a fugitive for three decades.

    Dura lex, sed lex

    ReplyDelete
  2. AdminSeptember 28, 2009 at 11:16 AM

    Point well-taken. BUT, this fits right in with my point. (I was alluding to Bill Clinton and his impeachment trial in my post)

    Neither Clinton's case nor Polanski's case has anything to do with sex. It's all about the law. And, of course, liberals are inconsistent because they fully support one but not the other.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)